Appendix 1 – Weightings to calculate overall quality score
The QRP uses a composite weighted average for calculating overall quality scores.
Element of QRP | Percentage allocated |
Financial statements | 60 |
VFM arrangements conclusion | 30 |
Housing benefit | 10 |
Total | 100 |
RAG rating methodology for QRP elements of financial statements, VFM conclusion and housing benefit work.
Rating | Firm level: Overall Audit Quality score | Firm level: Individual QRP element | Regime level |
Green | Firm audit quality score ≥2 and no scores of ‘0’ at file review level | Average element score ≥2 and no scores of ‘0’ at file review level | No more than one firm at amber and none at red |
Amber | Firm audit quality score ≥1 with up to two scores of ‘0’ at file review level | Average element score ≥1 with up to one score of ‘0’ at file review level | No more than one firm at red |
Red | Firm audit quality score <1, or Firm audit quality score ≥1 but three or more scores of ‘0’ at file review level | Average element score <1, or Average element score ≥1 but two or more scores of ‘0’ at file review level | Two or more firms at red |
Terms of Appointment compliance RAG rating based on quarterly monitoring indicators
Rating | Overall firm level score- indicators |
Green | Four or more indicators at red. |
Red | Four or more indicators at red. |
Amber | Neither green nor red. |
Regime | Green – no more than one firm at amber and none at red; Amber – no more than one firm at red; Red – two or more at red. |
Combined audit quality and Terms of Appointment compliance RAG
QRP RAG | ||||
Red | Amber | Green | ||
Terms of Appointment compliance RAG | Red | R | R | A |
Amber | R | A | A | |
Green | A | A | G |
RAG rating the results of satisfaction survey results
Firm 0-10 assessment (average) | Firm unsatisfactory – satisfactory assessment (average) | PSAA RAG rating |
0-3 | very dissatisfied / dissatisfied / unsatisfactory | R |
4-6 | reasonable / good / satisfied | A |
7-10 | very good / very satisfied / outstanding | G |