Regulatory Compliance and Quality Review Programme 2019

Appendix 1 – Weightings to calculate overall quality score

The QRP uses a composite weighted average for calculating overall quality scores.

Element of QRP Percentage allocated
Financial statements 60
VFM arrangements conclusion 30
Housing benefit 10
Total 100

RAG rating methodology for QRP elements of financial statements, VFM conclusion and housing benefit work.

Rating Firm level: Overall Audit Quality score Firm level: Individual QRP element Regime level
Green Firm audit quality score ≥2 and no scores of ‘0’ at file review level Average element score ≥2 and no scores of ‘0’ at file review level No more than one firm at amber and none at red
Amber Firm audit quality score ≥1 with up to two scores of ‘0’ at file review level Average element score ≥1 with up to one score of ‘0’ at file review level No more than one firm at red
Red Firm audit quality score <1, or Firm audit quality score ≥1 but three or more scores of ‘0’ at file review level Average element score <1, or Average element score ≥1 but two or more scores of ‘0’ at file review level Two or more firms at red

Terms of Appointment compliance RAG rating based on quarterly monitoring indicators

Rating Overall firm level score- indicators
Green Four or more indicators at red.
Red Four or more indicators at red.
Amber Neither green nor red.
Regime Green – no more than one firm at amber and none at red; Amber – no more than one firm at red; Red – two or more at red.

Combined audit quality and Terms of Appointment compliance RAG

    QRP RAG
    Red Amber Green
Terms of Appointment compliance RAG Red R R A
Amber R A A
Green A A G

RAG rating the results of satisfaction survey results

Firm 0-10 assessment (average) Firm unsatisfactory – satisfactory assessment (average) PSAA RAG rating
0-3 very dissatisfied / dissatisfied / unsatisfactory R
4-6 reasonable / good / satisfied A
7-10 very good / very satisfied / outstanding G

Back to top